Petitioner sought punishment for non-compliance with a prior order. As the petitioner did not press the application and expressed no longer being interested, the court dismissed the contempt application for non-appearance.
Contempt application dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
15-09-2022 Item no.9
Subrata Bhattacharyya
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
CPAN No.1395 of 2003 Nurul Islam Molla -vs-
Mr. Iqbal Hossian Gazi & Ors. arising out of WPA No.10172 of 2003
None …for the petitioner
To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioner.
The petitioner, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 filed on September 9, 2003, sought for punishment of the alleged contemners/respondents concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated July 21, 2003 passed by this court in WP No.10172(W) of 2003.
It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.
I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.
Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner.
[Rabindranath Samanta, J]
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a contempt application can be dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner who is no longer interested to proceed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nurul Islam Molla
Mr. Iqbal Hossian Gazi & Ors.
Rabindranath Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
