The single-judge bench of Md. Nizamuddin and Tapabrata Chakraborty, JJ., dismissed a writ petition challenging a Union of India decision as 'not pressed' by the petitioner's counsel during argument. No order as to costs was passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.06.2021
Item No.12 Court No.30 Krishnendu
W.P.A. No. 9888 of 2020
With
I.A. No. C.A.N. 1 of 2021
In re: Smt. Vanmala Gorakh Nangare & Anr. - Versus – Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Ramendu Agarwal
For the petitioners
On the prayer of Mr. Agarwal, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners, the present writ petition, being W.P.A .No. 9888 of 2020, and the connected application, being I.A. No. C.A.N. 1 of 2021, are dismissed as “ not pressed”.
There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Md.Nizamuddin, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Smt. Vanmala Gorakh Nangare & Anr.
Union of India & Ors.
Md. Nizamuddin
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
