Writ petition connected to an existing WPA was dismissed by the High Court on the ground that it was not pressed. No order as to costs was made.
Writ petition dismissed as not pressed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25.06.2021
Item No.07 Court No.30 Krishnendu
WPA (H) 22 of 2021 (Through Video Conference)
In re: An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India;
And
In re: Rahim Mondal - Versus –
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Apalak Basu Mr. Debayan Ghosh Mr. Nazir Ahmed
For the Petitioner
Mr. Rana Mukherjee Md. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Koustav Bagchi Mr. Debayan Ghosh
For the State
For Respondent Nos.4 & 5
On the prayer of Mr. Basu, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, the present writ petition, being WPA (H) 22 of 2021, is dismissed as “not pressed”.
There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Md.Nizamuddin, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Rahim Mondal
The State of West Bengal
Md.Nizamuddin
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
