A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was disposed of without further orders as the missing individual in the habeas corpus petition was recovered during the pendency of the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.06.2021 Court No.30 rpan / 16
W.P.A. (H) No. 11 of 2021
In re: An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India;
And
In re: Sri Swapan Banik – Versus – The Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Niladri Saha
… for the Petitioner.
Mr. Saibal Bapuli, Md. Sabir Ahmed
… for the State respondents.
Mr. Saha, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, submits that during pendency of the present habeas corpus petition, the missing son of the petitioner has been recovered.
In view thereof, no further order is required to be passed in the present writ petition and the same is, accordingly, disposed of.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Md.Nizamuddin, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Sri Swapan Banik
The Union of India
Md. Nizamuddin
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
