The Calcutta High Court granted interest at 8% per annum on revised arrear pension due to the respondent petitioner, though noting no statutory limitation period applied. Payment ordered within eight weeks.
Directed Director of Pension to pay 8% annual interest on revised arrear pension from 01.06.2009 within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
89 18.02 akb 2021 Ct. No. 2
Calcutta High Court In the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Jurisdiction
W.P.A. 363 of 2021 Krishna Bahadur Limboo -Versus-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Debjit Kundu Ms. Ujani Pal (Samanta) …For the Petitioner
Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh Ms. Bedashruti Bose …For the State Respondents
2
648 on the issue of limitation relating to payment or refixation of pay or pension wherein the Apex Court had held that relief may be granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the rights of the third party.
( Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding delayed pension interest should be allowed despite filing delay in absence of statutory period of limitation
Whether the petitioner is entitled to 8% annual interest on revised arrear pension amount from 01.6.2009
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.Referred¶10
W.P. 17557 (W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.)
Union of India vs. Tarsem SinghReferred¶10
Union of India vs. Tarsem Singh, (2008) 8 SCC 648 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Krishna Bahadur Limboo
The State of West Bengal
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
