This writ petition challenged inaction regarding pensionary benefits. The High Court ordered the respondent authority to consider the applications, provide a hearing, and pass a reasoned order within six weeks.
Direction to respondent no. 2 to consider petitions, grant hearing, and pass reasoned order within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18 18.02.2021 Sc
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT IN THE CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI APPELLATE JURISDICTION (Via Video Conference)
W.P.A. 116 OF 2021
Kausallya Thapa & Ors.
-vs.-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Amritam Mondal Mr. Debasish Mukhopadhyay.
….For the Petitioner
Mr. Subir Kumar Saha
Mr. Bikramaditya Ghosh.
….For the State
2
been passed in respect to the same Memorandum dated November 24, 2017.
3
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the authority must consider applications for pensionary benefits and grant a hearing to petitioners?
What is the proper procedure for the respondent authority to determine the pension pensionary claims?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kausallya Thapa & Ors.
The State of West Bengal
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
