Disposed
Sangita Saha and Anr. v. Jaya Saha and Anr.
Calcutta HCCS/96/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-13
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE
IA NO. GA/6/2024 In CS/96/2020
SANGITA SAHA AND ANR Vs
JAYA SAHA AND ANR
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE SUGATO MAJUMDAR Date : 20th March, 2025.
Appearance: Mr. Arnab Mukherjee, Adv. …for the plaintiff
Mrs. Suparna Mukherjee, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sayantan Bose, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Gope, Adv. …for the defendant no. 1
The Court:- The instant application, namely, GA/6/2024 is filed in terms
of the Order of the Division Bench dated 3rd December, 2024 praying for impleading the executor of the Will as a party.
In terms of the Order dated 3rd December, 2024, the Division Bench directed that the Executor may be impleaded as a party in the present suit. A supplementary affidavit is filed containing proposed amendments. Mrs. Mukherjee, Learned Senior Counsel for the defendant no. 1 did not raise any objection in view of the order passed and observations made by the Division Bench.
2
Let prayers (a) to (d) of the Master’s Summons be allowed. The department
is directed to carry out the amendments.
Since no affidavit is filed, allegations, if any, shall not be deemed to be
admitted.
GA/6/2024 stands disposed of accordingly.
(SUGATO MAJUMDAR, J.)
T.O. AR(CR)
Sugato Majumdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court