Khristodan Neye Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

This appeal has been preferred against the order of the learned single Judge dated 12^th July, 2021 passed in WPA 10696 of 2021 whereby the prayer made by the learned counsel for the appellant to grant interim protection has been declined.

¶14

Learned counsel for the parties do not dispute that in the meanwhile respondent has filed the affidavit-inopposition and the matter is ripe for hearing and in fact it is already included in the hearing list. A joint submission has been made by learned counsel for the parties that the interest of justice will be served, if the main matter itself is heard expeditiously.

¶15

Hence, we dispose of this appeal granting liberty to the parties to make a request to the concerned learned single Judge for taking up the petition for hearing on an early date.

¶16

2

¶17

MAT 700 of 2021

¶18

We express hope that having regard to the nature of controversy involved in the matter, the prayer made by learned counsel for the parties will be duly considered.

¶19

Accordingly, the appeal along with connected application is disposed of.

¶20

[Prakash Shrivastava, (C.J.)]

¶21

[Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.]

Khristodan Neye v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khristodan Neye v. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrityunjay Kumar Pandey Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Anima Mondal Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.

Amal Chaudhury Vs the State of West Bengal and Ors.

Dhakalia Agro Prod. P. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors.

State of West Bengal & Ors. Vs Sushila Drolia

Sudip Ghosh Chowdhury Vs State of West Bengal and Ors.