Appeal and connected matter listed. Appellant was absent. No prayer for accommodation. Both MAT 602 of 2021 and CAN 1 of 2021 were dismissed. All interim orders were discharged.
MAT 602 of 2021 and CAN 1 of 2021 are dismissed. Interim orders discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
09.11.21 22 Ct. No.11 Sws.M
MAT 602 of 2021
With CAN 1 of 2021
Mritunjay Kumar Pandey Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors.
(Via Video Conference)
Mr. S. Rudra
..….for the Respondent Nos. 5 & 7 Mr. Raja Saha Ms. Rupsha Chakraborty
..….for the State
Party/Parties is/are represented in the order of their name/names as printed above in the cause-title.
The Respondent Nos. 5 and 7 are represented by Mr. S. Rudra, learned Advocate.
The Respondent Nos. 5 and 7 file Affidavit-inOpposition, which is taken on record.
The State is represented by Ms. Rupsha Chakraborty, learned Advocate led by Mr. Raja Saha, learned Counsel.
2
None appears for the appellant when the matter is
called.
No accommodation is prayed for.
Accordingly, MAT 602 of 2021 and CAN 1 of 2021 stand dismissed .
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
All parties to act on a server copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent Xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Kesang Doma Bhutia, J.) (Subrata Talukdar, J)
Mritunjay Kumar Pandey
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Kesang Doma Bhutia
Subrata Talukdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
