Surabuddin Molla v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
Fed. Mkt. Auth. Writ Appeal (FMA) 670 of 2020 (CAN 1 of 2019) dismissed for default as the appellant failed to appear. Connected application also dismissed.
Fed. Mkt. Auth. Writ Appeal (FMA) 670 of 2020 (CAN 1 of 2019) dismissed for default as the appellant failed to appear. Connected application also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
D/L Item No. 7 18.11.2021 KOLE
FMA 670 of 2020 WITH CAN 1 of 2019 (Old No. 9604 of 2019) Surabuddin Molla -Vs.Bank Baroda
Nobody appeared on behalf of the appellant on earlier occasion.
Today when the matter is posted as “For Orders”, the appellant is also un-represented.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Connected application is also dismissed.
( Joymalya Bagchi , J .)
( Bivas Pattanayak , J .)
Bank Baroda
Joymalya Bagchi
Bivas Pattanayak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court