The appeal in SAT 74 of 2017 was dismissed for default as the appellant appeared unrepresented on the day of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18.11.2021 SAT 74 of 2017 s/l.3 pk Pradip Kumar Dey Vs. Sekhar Chandra Naskar
Nobody appears on behalf of the appellant on earlier occasion.
Today when the matter is called on, the
appellant is also unrepresented.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default. Connected application, if any, is also dismissed.
(Bivas Pattanayak) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
Pradip Kumar Dey
Sekhar Chandra Naskar
Bivas Pattanayak
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
