Dismissed
Brindaban Mondal @ Roy v. Mihir Kumar Mondal & Anr.
Calcutta HCCRR/522/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No.39 CHC (Dissmissed for default) C.R.R.…
What the court decided
AI extract
No.39 CHC (Dissmissed for default) C.R.R.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.09.2021 Item no.6 Ct. No.39 CHC (Dissmissed for default)
C.R.R. No.522 of 2011
In Re: An application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
AND
In the matter of:-
Brindaban Mondal alias Roy …..petitioner
Nobody for the petitioner appears either physically or in virtual mode, when the matter is called on for hearing.
No accommodation is proposed for and on behalf of the petitioner.
Yesterday, similarly none appears for the petitioner in spite of the matter being listed.
This is a long pending revisional application relatable to 2011, wherein the order passed by learned Executive Magistrate, 2nd Court, Alipore in M.P. Case No.325 of 2011, under Section 144(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is under challenge.
Petitioner appears to have lost his interest over this case.
No use of getting this matter listed any more.
The revisional application being C.R.R.522 of 2011 accordingly stands dismissed for default.
2
Department is directed to make communication of this order to the concerned learned Executive Magistrate within one week from hence for necessary information.
(Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Brindaban Mondal alias Roy
Subhasis Dasgupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court