The High Court dismissed a long-pending revisional application (C.R.R. No.496 of 2011) for default due to the petitioner's absence. No accommodation was proposed, and the matter was not to be listed further.
CM No. 496 of 2011 is dismissed for default. Department directed to communicate order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.09.2021 Item no.4 Ct. No.39 CHC (Dissmissed for default)
C.R.R. No.496 of 2011
In Re: An application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
AND
In the matter of:-
Adhir Kumar Gupta …..petitioner
Nobody appears for the petitioner, either physically or in virtual mode, when the matter is called on for hearing.
No accommodation is proposed for and on behalf of the petitioner.
This is a long pending revisional application relatable to 2011, wherein the order passed by learned Executive Magistrate, Asansol, under Section 144 Cr.P.C. in M.P. Case No.811 of 2010 is under challenge.
Petitioner appears to have lost his interest over this case.
No use of getting this matter listed any more.
The revisional application being C.R.R.496 of 2011 accordingly stands dismissed for default.
Department is directed to make communication of this order to the concerned learned Executive Magistrate for information within a week from hence.
(Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)
2
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Adhir Kumar Gupta
Subhasis Dasgupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
