Petitioner did not appear physically or virtually. The revisional application was dismissed for default. The department was directed to communicate the order to the concerned Executive Magistrate.
Order dated 14.01.2011 stands dismissed for default. Department directed to communicate order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23.09.2021 Item no.4 Ct. No.39 CHC (Dissmissed for default)
C.R.R. No.450 of 2011
In Re: An application under Section 401 read with Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
AND
In the matter of:-
Raman Kumar Singh …..petitioner
None appears for the petitioner, either physically, or in virtual mode.
No accommodation is proposed for and on behalf of the petitioner.
This revisional application is relatable to 2011. Several dates, previously fixed already, went adjourned, for the non appearance of the petitioner. This is a case, wherein the order dated 14.01.2011, passed by the learned Executive Magistrate, 2nd Court, Howrah, in connection with a proceeding under Section 144(2) Cr.P.C. vide M.P. Case No.84 of 2011/M.C. No.27 of 2011 is under challenge.
Petitioner appears to have lost his interest over this case.
No use of getting this matter listed any more.
The revisional application being C.R.R.450 of 2011 stands dismissed for default.
2
Department is directed to make communication of this order
to the concerned learned Executive Magistrate, 2nd Court, Howrah, within a week from hence for necessary information.
(Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Raman Kumar Singh
Subhasis Dasgupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
