This order dismissed a revision application for non-prosecution upon the representation of the learned advocate-on-record at a physical hearing.
Revision application C.R.R.459 of 2011 dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28.09.2021 Item no.5 Ct. No.39 CHC
C.R.R. No.459 of 2011 (Physical Hearing)
In Re: An application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
AND
In the matter of:-
…..petitioners
Mr. Tarak Nath Halder
…for the petitioners
Learned advocate-on-record, Mr. Tarak Nath Halder upon receiving instruction from his clients/petitioners submits that the petitioners do not want to proceed with the instant revisional application.
The written instruction received by learned advocate-onrecord be kept on record.
The revisional application being C.R.R.459 of 2011, accordingly on the prayer of learned advocate-on-record, stands dismissed for non prosecution.
(Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)
Tarak Nath Halder
Subhasis Dasgupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
