Joydeb Koley v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
On default of appearance by the petitioner and no prayer for accommodation, a criminal revision application under Sections 403 CrPC read with Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for default.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner's application dismissed for default; department directed to communicate order.
What the court decided
Sl. 29 07.7.2021 Court No.26 SD
CRR 3208 of 2005 (Via Video Conference)
In re: An application under Sections 397, 401 read with Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
In the matter of: Joydeb Koley
… Petitioner.
Mr. Prasun Kumar Dutta Ms. Manisha Sharma
… for the State.
This matter has been called on several days and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. No accommodation has been prayed for. When the matter was called on today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
Accordingly, this matter is dismissed for default and connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The department concerned is directed to communicate the order passed in Court today to the Court below. The department shall ensure that acknowledgement of receipt of their communication is received. Report of compliance to be placed before this Court after three weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Joydeb Koley
- respondent
The State
Coram
Shekhar B. Saraf
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRR/3208/2005
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court