Application dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner. Interim order vacated and lower court directed to act expeditiously.
Application and connected applications dismissed for default; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sl. 28 07.7.2021 Court No.26 SD
CRR 3182 of 2005 (Via Video Conference)
In re: An application under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
In the matter of: Krishnendu Roy
… Petitioner.
Mr. Prasun Kumar Dutta Ms. Manisha Sharma
… for the State.
This matter has been called on several days and none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. No accommodation has been prayed for. When the matter was called on today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
Accordingly, this matter is dismissed for default and connected applications, if any, are also dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The department concerned is directed to communicate the order passed in Court today to the Court below. The department shall ensure that acknowledgement of receipt of their communication is received. Report of compliance to be placed before this Court after three weeks.
The lower Court is directed to expeditiously act in accordance with law.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Krishnendu Roy
The State
Shekhar B. Saraf
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
