Dismissed
Sima Paul & Ors. v. Ajit Baran Roy
Calcutta HCCRR/136/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court held that the application under Section 401 CrPC read with Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the petitioners despite multiple dates being called. The department was directed to communicate the order, and the lower court was ordered to expeditiously act in accordance with the law.
What did the court decide?
The matter was dismissed for default; connected applications dismissed; interim order vacated; department directed to communicate order.