The petitioner's advocate submitted a written instruction not to proceed. Consequently, the revisional application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
01.10.2021 Item no.2 Ct. No.39 CHC
C.R.R. No.2298 of 2016
In the matter of:-
Nemai Sadhukhan & ors.
…..petitioners
Mr. Shashanka Shekhar Saha
Mr. Shashanka Shekhar Saha, learned advocate-on-record representing the petitioners submits that he does not want to proceed with this case. He has furnished a written instruction, which he received from his clients/petitioners.
The written instruction so received by the learned advocateon-record, be taken on record.
The instant revisional application being C.R.R.2298 of 2016, accordingly, stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Nemai Sadhukhan & ors.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
