The revisional application filed by C.K. Birla and others was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioners, represented by counsel, indicated they did not wish to proceed following a settlement reached between the parties via video conference.
Revisional application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
49 01.10.2021 NB
Ct. No. 39
CRR 1085 of 2011 (via video conference)
In the matter of:- C.K. Birla, Chairman & Anr. …petitioners
Mr. Cedric Fernandez, Mr. Srinjoy Sengupta. …for the petitioners.
Learned advocate-on-record, Mr. Cedric Fernandez upon receiving instruction from his clients/petitioners submits that the petitioners do not want to proceed with the instant revisional application. It is further submitted that a settlement has been reached between the parties.
That being the position, on the prayer of the learned advocateon-record, the revisional application being CRR 1085 of 2011 stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Urgent Xerox certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)
C.K. Birla
Others
Subhasis Dasgupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
