Allowed

Manirul Khan@Kelo v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC9 Nov 2021CRM/5233/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Calcutta, capitalizing on the failure of the State to appear despite repeated summons, granted bail to the petitioner charged with offences under IPC and POCSO. The order conditions release on a bond and regular court attendance, allowing trial courts to cancel bail for non-compliance without further reference.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount.

Manirul Khan@Kelo Vs State of West Bengal — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Calcutta HC (2021)

¶1

550 09.11.2021

¶2

AD Ct. No.29 (Allowed)

¶3

C.R.M. 5233 of 2021

¶4

In Re: - An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 06/08/2021 in connection with Baruipur P.S. Case No. 83 of 2021 dated 09/04/2021 under Sections 363/365 of the Indian Penal Code which ended up in charge sheet no.101/2021 dated 30.06.2021 under Sections 363/365/376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.

¶5

And

¶6

In the matter of: Monirul Khan alias Kele

¶7

….petitioner. Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty Mr. Shashanka Shekhar Saha …for the petitioner. Petitioner seeks bail.

¶8

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner draws the attention of the Court to the statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the victim girl.

¶9

None appears for the State.

¶10

The bail petition is pending since August, 2021. Repeated requests to the Public Prosecutor and the Additional Public Prosecutors to ensure that the State is represented when the matters are called on did not evoke any response despite their continued assurances.

¶11

In such circumstances, in absence of any material being placed on behalf of the State implicating the petitioner and in view of the statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, we grant bail to the petitioner.

¶12

Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Judge Special Court under POCSO Act, Baruipur, South 24

¶13

¶14

Porganas subject to the condition that during bail he shall appear before the learned trial court regularly till disposal of the trial and he shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

¶15

In the event the petitioner fails to comply with the conditions as enshrined hereinbefore, it is open to the trial court to cancel the bail without any further reference to this Court.

¶16

The application for bail being C.R.M. 5233 of 2021 is, thus, disposed of.

¶17

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

¶18

(Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.)

Manirul Khan@Kelo v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manirul Khan@Kelo v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laxmi Halder and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Shebai Ghosh @ Appai Ghosh @ Shibai and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Raj Kumar Das@Rajkumar Das Vs State of West Bengal

Raju Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal

MD Raja Alias Jang Raja and Ors. Vs State of West Bengal

Md. Haider Qureshi @ Shakeel @ Sakil Kuraishi and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal