The accused petitioner failed to appear for the hearing of an application for cancellation of bail. As no accommodation was sought, the application was dismissed for default via video conference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM No.282 of 2018 Via video conference
12.07.21 (S.R.) In re: An application for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) read Sl.55 with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; Ct.30 And In re: Rahaman Sardar … petitioner. Ms. Amita Gaur …for the State. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation has been sought for.
In view thereof, the application being CRM No.282 of 2018 is dismissed for default.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow or dismiss the application for cancellation of bail due to default appearance of the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rahaman Sardar
The State
Suvra Ghosh
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
