Dismissed
Haradhan Sarkar v. Jagadish Kumar Bansal & Anr.
Calcutta HCCRM/2627/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Court No.30 Item No.24 Krishnendu Dismissed…
What the court decided
AI extract
Court No.30 Item No.24 Krishnendu Dismissed…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
09.07.2021 Court No.30 Item No.24 Krishnendu Dismissed
CRM 2627 of 2019 (Via video Conference)
In Re:- An application under section 439 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure;
And
In Re: Haradhan Sarkar
Petitioner
Mr. Rudradipta Nandy
For the State
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner and no accommodation
has been sought for though Mr. Nandy, learned advocate appearing for
the State, is present.
In view thereof, the application, being CRM 2627 of 2019, is dismissed for default.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Haradhan Sarkar
State
Suvra Ghosh
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court