NIAC dismissed a bail cancellation application under CrPC S. 439(2) for default as the petitioner failed to appear and the court did not receive any request for accommodation.
Application CRM No.1761 of 2015 dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM No.1761 of 2015 Via video conference
12.07.21 (S.R.) In re: An application for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) of the Sl.34 Code of Criminal Procedure; Ct.30 And In re: Nilam Doga @ Kamani … petitioner. Mr. Narayan Prasad Agarwala Mr. Pratick Bose …for the State. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner and no
accommodation has been sought for.
In view thereof, the application being CRM No.1761 of 2015 is dismissed for default.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) of CrPC should be allowed when the petitioner has failed to appear and seek accommodation.
Whether the bail application is to be dismissed for default due to non-appearance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nilam Doga @ Kamani
The State
Suvra Ghosh
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
