Sripati Lal Mistri v. State of West Bengal
Case brief
What is this about?
03, 2021. mb C. O. No. 2699 of 2005 with CAN…
03, 2021. mb C. O. No. 2699 of 2005 with CAN…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AD. 79. August 03, 2021. mb
C. O. No. 2699 of 2005 with CAN 1 of 2020(CAN 2515 of 2020) (Via video conference)
Sripati Lal Mistri and others Vs.
The State of West Bengal and others
Mr. Arup Krishna Das
… for the petitioners.
When the matter is called on for hearing,
the learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner no. 1 indicated that the petitioners are not willing to proceed any further with the matter.
In such view of the matter, C.O. No. 2699 of 2005 along with C.A.N. 1 of 2020 (Old No. C.A.N. 2515 of 2020) stand dismissed for default.
There will be no order as to costs.
Interim order, if any passed in this matter,
stands automatically vacated.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Sripati Lal Mistri
The State of West Bengal
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court