A writ petitioner was absent and failed to contact counsel. The petition was dismissed for default as they were deemed no longer interested in the proceedings.
Matter is dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AD. 111. August 3, 2021. MNS.
C. O. No. 1177 of 2009
with
CAN 1 of 2010(CAN 4234 of 2010) ( Via video conference )
Sri Netai Das and another Vs.
Smt. Loora Roy and others
Ms. Shila Sarkar
…for the petitioners.
Mr. Deba Prasad Mukherjee, Mr. Debjit Mukherjee
…for the KMC.
When the matter is called on for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners, in her usual fairness, submits that the clients have not contacted with her in the meantime.
Hence, although the KMC is represented through counsel, it appears that the petitioners are no longer interested in proceeding with the matter.
Accordingly, C. O. No. 1177 of 2009, along with connected application, if any, are dismissed for default.
There will be no order as to costs.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Sri Netai Das and another
Smt. Loora Roy and others
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
