Single judge order correcting a clerical error in a previous judgment by redefining the lower court as Second Additional Court at Contai instead of Second Court.
Correction incorporated that the impugned order was passed by Second Additional Court at Contai, deemed part of judgment dated August 02, 2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AD. 3. August 23, 2021. mb.
C. O. No. 1115 of 2021
Nirmalendu Mishra alias Jyotin Mishra & Ors. Vs. Sri Swapan Raj and others
Mr. Raghunath Das, Mr. Sounak Mondal … for the petitioners.
Mr. Ashim Kumar Routh …for the opposite party nos. 1 and 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners rightly points out that, in the judgment dated August 02, 2021, it was recorded in the 27th paragraph, at page 9 of the same, that the impugned order was passed by the “Second Court at Contai”, whereas it should have been “Second Additional Court at Contai”.
Let such correction be deemed to be incorporated in the judgment dated August 02, 2021.
This order be treated to be a part of the judgment dated August 02, 2021.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Nirmalendu Mishra alias Jyotin Mishra & Ors.
Sri Swapan Raj and others
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
