Allowed

Habib Sekh@Habib Sk v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC17 Dec 2020CRM/8836/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-bench order granting anticipatory bail to appellants arrested in a case involving assault on police personnel. Court noted prima facie involvement but potential false implication due to prior enmity and lack of medical injuries, directing release on a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted directing release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of like amount.

Habib Sekh@Habib Sk Vs State of West Bengal — Quashing and FIR | Calcutta HC (2020)

¶1

17.12.2020 Court No.28 SL No.76 AP

¶2

CRM 8836 of 2020 (Through Video Conference)

¶3

In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Nalhati P.S. Case No. 141/2020 dated 10.08.2020 under Sections 143/341/325/ 326/307/186/332/333/353/489(C) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 25(1)(a)/27 of the Arms Act.

¶4

And

¶5

In the matter of: Habib Sekh @ Habib Sk & Ors.

¶6

….Petitioners.

¶7

Mr. Bitasok Banerjee,

¶8

Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharjee, Mr. Biswajit Mitra

¶9

…for the Petitioners.

¶10

Mr. Madhusudan Sur, Ld. A.P.P., Mr. Aniket Mitra

¶11

…for the State.

¶12

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that father of the petitioner No.1 made complaints with regard to the misdeeds of former upo-pradhan. As a result the said petitioner and his associates are being harassed by false implication in one case after another.

¶13

Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the witnesses show the presence of the petitioners, except petitioner No.4, in the unlawful assembly and assaulted police personnel who are discharging their official duty.

¶14

We have considered the materials on record. Statements of witnesses show prima facie role of the petitioners except petitioner No.4 in assaulting police personnel. No injuries are noted in the medical papers. In view of the aforesaid dichotomy between ocular version vis a vis medical evidence likelihood of false implication owing to prior enmity cannot be ruled out. Under such circumstances, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶15

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

¶16

¶17

Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

¶18

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

¶19

The parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this court.

¶20

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)

¶21

(Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Habib Sekh@Habib Sk v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Habib Sekh@Habib Sk v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kazi Nrujamman@Lalu Kazi Vs State of West Bengal

Debasish Kar Vs the State of West Bengal

Bablu Biswas Vs State of West Bengal

Md. Atesam @ MD Ehtesham Vs State of West Bengal

Robiul Khan Alias Rabiul Khan Alias Karen Vs State of West Bengal

Romen Ghosh@Ramkrishna Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal