Romen Ghosh@Ramkrishna Ghosh v. State of West Bengal
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court rejected the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail, refusing to re-open an earlier decision based on erroneous submissions. The court permitted the petitioner to approach the lower court within two weeks for regular bail, which would be considered independently.
What did the court decide?
The application for anticipatory bail is rejected. The petitioner may approach the lower court within two weeks for regular bail.
What the court decided
17.12.2020 Court No.28 SL No.75 AP
CRM 8832 of 2020 (Through Video Conference)
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Salar P.S. Case No. 211 of 2019 dated 05.12.2019 under Sections 341/325/326/ 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
And Romen Ghosh @ Ramkrishna Ghosh ….Petitioner.
In the matter of: Romen Ghosh @ Ramkrishna Ghosh
Mr. Arindam Roy, Mr. Sk. Jalaluddin, Mr. M.F.A. Begg
…for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Mr. Ratna Ghosh
…for the State.
Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner is kept on record.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that application for anticipatory bail was disposed of on erroneous submission.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for anticipatory bail should be reopened given the claim that the earlier disposal was erroneous.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail from the lower court.
Whether a fresh application for anticipatory bail can be entertained after a prior application was rejected.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Romen Ghosh @ Ramkrishna Ghosh
- respondent
The State
Coram
Suvra Ghosh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM/8832/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court