A single bench of the High Court rejected the bail application filed under Section 439 CrPC for petitioners accused of murder and throwing bombs in Sainthia Police Station Case No. 86 of 2020, citing their prima facie involvement in an unlawful assembly.
Bail application rejected; petitioners remain in custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18.12.2020 68 Sdas rejected
C.R.M. 10564 of 2020
(via video conference)
In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Sainthia Police Station Case No. 86 of 2020 dated 23.05.2020 under Sections 341/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Explosive Substances Act.
And
In Re : Sk. Salauddin & Ors. ….. petitioners
Mr. Tapas Kumar Ghosh Mr. Tanmay Chowdhury … for the petitioners
Mr. Madhusudan Sur, learned A.P.P. Mr. Manoranjan Mahata … for the State
Statements of the witnesses disclose involvement of the
petitioners as members of the unlawful assembly who threw bombs at the deceased.
In view of prima facie involvement of the petitioners in the alleged murder, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.
The application for bail is, thus, rejected.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioners arrested for murder and throwing bombs.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sk. Salauddin & Ors.
State
Suvra Ghosh
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
