Dismissed
Mousumi Hati v. Dr Hrishikesh Ray
Calcutta HCCPAN/83/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
sg 09-12-2020 Ct. 12 CPAN 83 of 2020 IN FMA…
What the court decided
AI extract
sg 09-12-2020 Ct. 12 CPAN 83 of 2020 IN FMA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16 & 17 09-12-2020 sg Ct. 12
CPAN 83 of 2020 IN FMA 497 of 2019 Mousumi Hati & Ors. Versus Dr. Hrishikesh Ray
(Through Video Conference)
This application was adjourned at the request of the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants.
We have perused the order.
This is a contempt application of our order dated 20th November, 2019 wherein we specifically directed to refund the fees collected from the students for the period 2010 and 2012 together with interest at the rate of 12% per annum within four weeks from that date, failing which liberty was given to the petitioners to execute this order as a decree of Court.
In view of such aforesaid direction, non-payment of the amounts does not amount to contempt of Court. We have specifically provided the remedy to be availed by the petitioners in case of refund and non-payment of interest.
Accordingly, contempt application is dismissed.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Mousumi Hati & Ors.
Dr. Hrishikesh Ray
Saugata Bhattacharyya
Soumen Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court