Disposed¶29

Devidas Dhanaji Thali v. Managing Director City Industrial Development Corporation and Anr.

Bombay HC5 May 2026WP/8668/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CIDCO; City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd.; 12.5% Land Allotment Scheme; lottery; allotment of developed plot to petitioner's father Dhanaji Sawlaram Thali; petition rendered infructuous; withdrawal of writ petition; disposal as withdrawn; Bombay High Court; Writ Petition No. 8668 of 2025; no substantive adjudication.

What the court decided

AI extract

Devidas Dhanaji Thali vs Managing Director City Industrial Development Corporation and Anr. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

bipin prithiani

2-wp-8668.25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 8668 OF 2025

¶6

Devidas Dhanaji Thali … Petitioner Versus

¶7

Managing Director, City Industrial Development … Corporation & Anr.

¶8

… Respondents

¶9

¶10

Mr. Sachin K. Hande for the Petitioner. Mr. Soham Bhalerao i/by DSK Legal for Respondent-CIDCO. Mrs. Leena Patil, ‘B’ Panel Counsel, for Respondent-State.

¶11

¶12

Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER BIPINDHARMENDERPRITHIANI PRITHIANI Date: 2026.06.11 10:18:42 +0530

¶13

CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ.

¶14

DATE : 10^th JUNE 2026

¶15

P.C. :

¶16

. On 5^th May 2026, this Court had passed the following order :

¶17

“. The principal prayer in the present writ petition

¶18

pertains to a consideration of the claim of the petitioner under the 12.5% Land Allotment Scheme by lottery.

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. (CIDCO) submits that the petition is rendered infructuous, as allotment of a developed plot in the said scheme was already made in favour of the father of the petitioner i.e. Dhanaji Sawlaram Thali on 11^th June 2025.

¶20

We find that this writ petition was filed in May 2025 and the aforesaid allotment appears to have been made subsequent thereto.

¶21

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks short

bipin prithiani

2-wp-8668.25.doc

adjournment to take instructions in the matter.

¶26

List under the category of ‘fresh matters’ on 10^th June 2026.”

¶27

The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that a developed plot is indeed allotted to the father of the petitioner, as stated by the respondent-City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO).

¶28

In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioner has instructions to withdraw the petition.

¶29

Hence, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶30

(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.)

Devidas Dhanaji Thali v. Managing Director City Industrial Development Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Devidas Dhanaji Thali v. Managing Director City Industrial Development Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ashoka Wines Prpo Anita Bansal Totlani Throu. Heero Shyamlal Madhyani vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. the Sec Ministry of Co-Operation and Ors.

Vijay Krishnaji Walke vs Union of India Thr Its Secretary and Ors.

Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Govt Pleader and Ors.

Bharatkumar Mohanlal Suchak Since Dec Thr Lrs vs Kalyan Gas Services and Ors.

Kalyan Gas Services through D. M. Suchak vs the State of Maharashtra Thru. Secretary and Ors.

Axis Bank Ltd. vs Registrar, Chief Judical Magistrate