Disposed¶28

Bharatkumar Mohanlal Suchak Since Dec Thr Lrs v. Kalyan Gas Services and Ors.

Bombay HC5 May 2026IA/12367/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay HC interim order, 28 Apr 2026, Writ Petition 6979/2025, Kalyan Gas Services (Sole Proprietor D. M. Suchak) v State of Maharashtra & ors.: respondent No.6 PESO (Petroleum & Explosives Safety Organization) inspection pursuant to Court order dated 08.04.2026; objections largely removed including compound wall at loading/unloading area; ad-interim order continued till listing on 05.05.2026 in supplementary list; intervenors in Interim Applications 9507/2025 and 12367/2025; bench Manish Pitale and Shreeram V. Shirsat, JJ. Keywords: PESO, final inspection, objections removed, gas services, interim application, Bombay High Court 2026.

What did the court decide?

Continuation of the ad-interim order(s) till the next hearing on 05.05.2026, with PESO expected to complete the final inspection before that date. ¶28

Bharatkumar Mohanlal Suchak Since Dec Thr Lrs vs Kalyan Gas Services and Ors. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

907_WP6979_25.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.6979 OF 2025

¶5

Kalyan Gas Services through its Sole Proprietor D. M. Suchak

¶6

… Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary Ministry of Urban Development Department & ors. … Respondents

¶9

WITH

¶10

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.9507 OF 2025

¶11

WITH

¶12

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.12367 OF 2025

¶13

¶14

WRIT PETITION NO.6979 OF 2025

¶15

Mr. Drupad Patil with Mr. Sumit Kothari and Ms. Aishwarya Shinde for Petitioner.

¶16

Mr. P. S. Dani, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Sumit Khaire and Mr. Sandeep D. Shinde for Respondent Nos.3 to 5.

¶17

Mr. A. I. Patel, Additional GP a/w. Mr. Ketan Joshi, ‘B’ Panel Advocate a/w. Ms. M. S. Bane, AGP for Respondents-State.

¶18

Ms. Isha Hajare i/b. Dr. Uday Warunjikar for Intervenor in IA/9507/2025.

¶19

Mr. Himanshu Kode for Intervenor in IA/12367/2025.

¶20

CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ. DATE : APRIL 28, 2026

¶21

P.C. :

¶22

. In pursuance of order dated 08.04.2026, respondent No.6 - Petroleum & Explosives Safety Organization (PESO) has conducted the exercise of inspection. We are informed that certain objections were raised and most of the objections have now been removed.

¶23

The petitioner claims that the last objection pertaining to existence of a compound wall, that could be an obstruction for loading /

¶24

MINALSANDIPPARAB Digitally signedby MINALSANDIP PARABDate: 2026.04.2818:18:43 +0530

¶25

1/2

¶26

907_WP6979_25.doc

¶27

unloading area, has also been demolished and the concerned officer of the PESO is likely to finally inspect the premises.

¶28

In that light and for further directions, list on 05.05.2026 in the supplementary list. Ad-interim order shall continue to operate till then.

¶29

We expect the concerned officer of PESO to undertake the final inspection well before the next date of listing.

¶30

(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)

¶31

(MANISH PITALE, J.)

¶32

Minal Parab

¶33

2/2

Bharatkumar Mohanlal Suchak Since Dec Thr Lrs v. Kalyan Gas Services and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharatkumar Mohanlal Suchak Since Dec Thr Lrs v. Kalyan Gas Services and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Ashoka Wines Prpo Anita Bansal Totlani Throu. Heero Shyamlal Madhyani vs the State of Maharashtra Throu. the Sec Ministry of Co-Operation and Ors.

Vijay Krishnaji Walke vs Union of India Thr Its Secretary and Ors.

Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd. vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Govt Pleader and Ors.

Kalyan Gas Services through D. M. Suchak vs the State of Maharashtra Thru. Secretary and Ors.

Devidas Dhanaji Thali vs Managing Director City Industrial Development Corporation and Anr.

Axis Bank Ltd. vs Registrar, Chief Judical Magistrate