Disposed¶33

Jabbar Aamir Pathan v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Principal Secretary Urban Development Department and Ors.

Bombay HC29 Apr 2026WP/4745/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court group disposal (34 writ petitions, lead WP 504/2026; Manish Pitale & Shreeram V. Shirsat, JJ., 29-04-2026): shops/galas demolished for road widening without compensation; representations to Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation (moved December 2025 / January 2026) to be decided in accordance with law within eight weeks; petitions and pending applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.2 – Municipal Corporation directed to decide the petitioners' representations in accordance with law within eight weeks; pending applications, if any, disposed of. ¶33

Jabbar Aamir Pathan vs State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Principal Secretary Urban Development Department and Ors. — Bombay HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

908 & grp_WP_504_26 & grp.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 504 OF 2026

Vivek Vallabh Patil

… Petitioner

vs.

The State of Maharashtra, Thr. Principal Secy., Urban Development Department and others

¶7

… Respondents

¶8

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 580 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 596 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 722 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2096 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2847 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4139 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4141 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4145 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4146 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4573 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4738 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4740 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4742 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4744 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4745 OF 2026 WITH

¶9

PRIYA Digitallysigned byPRIYAKAMBLI KAMBLI Date:2026.04.3018:05:26+0530

¶10

1/4

¶11

908 & grp_WP_504_26 & grp.doc

¶12

WRIT PETITION NO. 4781 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4800 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4807 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4808 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4811 OF 2026. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4812 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5081 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5814 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5815 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5816 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5818 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5819 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5821 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5822 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5823 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5824 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5826 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5828 OF 2026

¶13

Mr. Farooque N. Momin a/w. Adv. Naofil A. Momin for petitioners in all petitions.

¶14

Mr. K. S. Thorat, ‘B’ Panel Advocate for respondent-State in WP/504/2026.

¶15

2/4

¶16

908 & grp_WP_504_26 & grp.doc

¶17

Mr. Rohan Sawant, ‘B’ Panel Advocate for respondent-State in WP/580/2026.

¶18

Ms. Apurva Thipsay, ‘B’ Panel Advocate for respondent-State in WP/596/2026. Mr. Ketan Joshi, ‘B’ Panel Advocate for respondent-State in WP/722/2026. Ms. S. D. Vyas, Addl. GP for respondent-State in WP/2096/2026. Ms. M. S. Bane, AGP for respondent-State in WP/2847/2026. Mr. N. C. Walimbe, Addl. GP for respondent-State in WP/4139/2026. Ms. G. R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for respondent-State in WP/4141/2026. Ms. P. M. J. Deshpande, AGP for respondent-State in WP/4145/2026. Mr. R. S. Pawar, AGP for respondent-State in WP/4146/2026.

¶19

Ms. Pooja Patil, AGP for respondent-State in WP/4573/2026.

¶20

Ms. N. M. Mehra, AGP for respondent-State in WP/4738/2026. Ms. R. A. Solanki, AGP for respondent-State in WP/4740/2026. Ms. M. P. Thakur, AGP for respondent-State in WP/4742/2026. Ms. P. J. Gavhane, AGP for respondent-State in WP/4744/2026. Mr. P. P. Kakade, Addl. GP for respondent-State in WP/4745/2026. Mr. O. A. Chandurkar, Addl. GP for respondent-State in WP/4781/2026. Ms. Neha S. Bhide, GP for respondent-State in WP/4800/2026. Mr. S. P. Kamble, AGP for respondent-State in WP/4807/2026. Ms. Priyanka Chavan, AGP for respondent-State in WP/4808/2026. Mr. A. A. Alaspurkar, AGP for respondent-State in WP/4811/2026. Ms. V. S. Nimbalkar, AGP for respondent-State in WP/4812/2026. Mr. B. V. Samant, Addl. GP for respondent-State in WP/5081/2026. Mr. A. I. Patel, Addl. GP for respondent-State in WP/5814/2026. Mr. Manish Pable, AGP for respondent-State in WP/5815/2026. Mr. Kankal, AGP for respondent-State in WP/5816/2026. Mr. A. C. Bhadang, AGP for respondent-State in WP/5818/2026. Ms. Devyani Deshmukh, AGP for respondent-State in WP/5819/2026. Mr. Hamid Mulla, AGP for respondent-State in WP/5821/2026. Mr. Y. D. Patil, AGP for respondent-State in WP/5822/2026.

¶21

Mr. A. K. Naik, AGP for respondent-State in WP/5823/2026.

¶22

Mr. A. R. Deolekar, AGP for respondent-State in WP/5824/2026.

¶23

Ms. Leena Patil, ‘B’ Panel Advocate for respondent-State in WP/5826/2026. Mr. V. G. Badgujar, AGP for respondent-State in WP/5828/2026.

¶24

Ms. Tanu N. Bhatia for respondent Nos.2 and 3 – Municipal Corporation in all petitions.

¶25

3/4

¶26

908 & grp_WP_504_26 & grp.doc

¶27

CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ DATE : 29^th APRIL, 2026

¶28

P.C. :

¶29

. The grievance of the petitioners in these petitions is that their shops / galas were demolished for widening of road and that they have not been paid compensation. The State of Maharashtra and the officers of Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation have been made respondents in these petitions.

¶30

In all these petitions, the petitioners have submitted their representations, addressed to the respondent No.2 – Municipal Corporation, seeking redressal of their grievances.

¶31

The learned AGPs appear for respondent No. 1 - State and Ms.Bhatia, learned counsel appears on behalf of respondent No.2 - Municipal Corporation and respondent No.3 - officer of the said Municipal Corporation.

¶32

We find substance in the contention raised on behalf of the respondent - Municipal Corporation that the representations moved by the petitioners in December 2025 / January 2026, can be decided in a time-bound period, so that the grievances of the petitioners can be addressed.

¶33

In view of the above, the writ petitions are disposed of by directing respondent No.2 to decide the representations submitted by the petitioners in accordance with law and within a period of eight weeks from today.

¶34

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶35

(SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.)

¶36

(MANISH PITALE, J.)

¶37

Priya Kambli

¶38

4/4

Jabbar Aamir Pathan v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Principal Secretary Urban Development Department and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jabbar Aamir Pathan v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Principal Secretary Urban Development Department and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Bharatkumar Mohanlal Suchak Since Dec Thr Lrs vs Kalyan Gas Services and Ors.

Kalyan Gas Services through D. M. Suchak vs the State of Maharashtra Thru. Secretary and Ors.

Crystal Cold Storage Co. Pvt. Ltd. Thru Authorized vs Indian Bank and Ors.

Jaidev Deepak Kalra Vs Bar Council of India and 2 Ors.

Citron Infraprojects Limited, through Its Director and Authorised Signatory Gopal Lohiya vs Ifci Limited, through Its Authorised Officer

Shreeji Investments LLP vs Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Settlement Authority at Aurangabad