Sayyed Siddiq Nayyum v. the State of Maharashtra through Its Chief Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Aurangabad Bench, Bombay High Court, paucity-of-time batch adjournment order dated 23-01-2026 by Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi & Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ.; adjourns writ petitions (2023-2025), civil applications, PIL No. 55 of 2024, Criminal PIL No. 12 of 2020, Family Court Appeals and Income Tax Appeal Nos. 43 and 79 of 2016 to dates between 16.04.2026 and 23.04.2026; directs that interim relief / undertaking / statement, if any, shall continue till next date; no merits argued, no parties or counsel named ('Appearances as per board'); signed B. S. Joshi.
What did the court decide?
Batch adjournment of the listed matters (board serial nos. 954 to 1043) to the dates mentioned against them, ranging from 16.04.2026 to 23.04.2026; interim relief / undertaking / statement, if any, in these matters to continue till next date. ¶¶5