Kalim Siddhiquie @ Kalim Beharim Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court, Dr. Neela Gokhale, J., 12-02-2026 — bail rejected, trial in progress; C.R. No. 47 of 2022, DCB CID Unit-V, Kurla, Mumbai; charges under IPC Ss. 344, 366, 376, 376(2)(k), 376(2)(n), 354, 354-A, 354-B, 354-D, 506, 506(2), 323, 34 with IT Act S. 66(E); victim (PW/1) deposition completed, second witness being examined, twelve prosecution witnesses intended; Trial Court requested to conclude trial within six months; Applicant: Kalim Siddhiquie @ Kalim Beharim Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra; intervenor represented by Sarthak P. Shetty; advocates: Karim Pathan (Applicant), Anuja Sunil Gotad and Malhora (APP).
What did the court decide?
No relief to the Applicant; bail refused. The Trial Court was requested to expedite the trial and preferably conclude it within six months from the date of communication of the order. ¶23