Disposed¶6

Rajesh Devidas Kardile v. Panvel Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Bombay HC15 Apr 2025WP/5134/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court common order dated 08.10.2025 (Ghuge & Bhobe, JJ.): hearings of board matters deferred for paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; earlier ad-interim/interim orders to continue subject to compliance; spare copies to be supplied within 14 days, failing which matters stand dismissed against unserved respondents; listing chart from 19/11/2025 to 08/12/2025.

What did the court decide?

Hearing of the listed matters deferred for want of time; earlier ad-interim/interim orders, if any, to continue subject to removal of office objections within two weeks and filing of affidavits before the next date; matters listed for Fresh Admission, Final hearing at admission stage (Sr.No.100), Urgent order, Due Admission and final hearing (Sr.Nos.299-300) between 19/11/2025 and 08/12/2025. ¶6

Rajesh Devidas Kardile vs Panvel Municipal Corporation and Anr. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶6

Ratio / Principle

All office objections in the matters on the board shall be removed within two weeks.

¶8

Key takeaways

Subject to compliance with the above directions, ad-interim/interim orders, if any granted earlier, will continue until the matters are heard.ratio¶9
Where notices could not be processed for non-supply of spare copies, the petitioner must supply spare copies within 14 days, failing which the matters will stand dismissed against the unserved respondents on the 15th day; if copies are supplied, the office is to issue notice to the unserved respondents returnable after four weeks.ratio¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Common order, High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Coram: Ravindra V. Ghuge and Ashwin D. Bhobe, JJ.), dated 08.10.2025. The matters on the board could not be taken up for hearing at rising time (5.15 p.m.) for want of time. Directions issued: (i) office objections to be removed within two weeks; (ii) subject to such compliance, ad-interim/interim orders, if any earlier granted, to continue; (iii) affidavits in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed before the next date; (iv) matters where service of notice is awaited to be put up after service; (v) where notices could not be processed for want of spare copies, petitioners to supply spare copies within 14 days, failing which the matters to stand dismissed against the unserved respondents on the 15th day, and on supply of copies, office to issue notice returnable after four weeks; (vi) matters assigned listing dates from 19/11/2025 to 08/12/2025 across categories Fresh Admission, Final hearing at admission stage (Sr.No.100), Urgent order, Due Admission and final hearing (Sr.Nos.299-300).

¶1

rajshree .. 1 .. common order 08.10.2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

¶4

DATE : 8^th OCTOBER, 2025.

¶5

P.C. :-

¶6

At the time of rising at 5.15 p.m., the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.7 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

¶7

In several of these matters, there are office

¶8

objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.

¶9

Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.

¶10

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed before the next date.

¶11

Matters in which service of notice is awaited, put up after service.

¶12

rajshree .. 2 .. common order 08.10.2025

¶13

Matters in which though notices were issued, the office could not process the notice due to non-supply of spare copies, the Petitioner shall supply spare copies for issuance of notice within 14 day, failing which, the matters in which copies are not supplied, would stand dismissed as against the unserved Respondents on the 15^th day. If copies are supplied, office to issue notice to the unserved Respondents, returnable after four weeks.

¶14

7. Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-

¶15

Serial Nos. of matters on the Board	To be listed on	To be listed in the category
8 to 26	19/11/2025	Fresh Admission
28 to 30	19/11/2025	- do -
32 to 37	20/11/2025	- do -
38 to 57	20/11/2025	- do -
59 to 70	21/11/2025	- do -
72 to 99	24/11/2025	- do -
100	24/11/2025	Final hearing at admission stage
101 to 112 (except Sr.No.104)	25/11/2025	Urgent order
114 to 115	25/11/2025	- do -

¶16

rajshree .. 3 .. common order 08.10.2025

¶17

117 to 118	25/11/2025	- do -
119 to 125	01/12/2025	Due Admission
127 to 128	01/12/2025	- do -
131 to 133	01/12/2025	- do -
135 to 149	02/12/2025	- do -
150 to 180	02/12/2025	- do -
181 to 210	03/12/2025	- do -
211 to 240	04/12/2025	- do -
241 to 254	05/12/2025	- do -
256 to 262	05/12/2025	- do -
264 to 288	08/12/2025	- do -
290 to 298	08/12/2025	- do -
299 to 300	08/12/2025	For final hearing

¶18

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )

Rajesh Devidas Kardile v. Panvel Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Devidas Kardile v. Panvel Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Archana Alok Avasthi vs Central Bank of India

Sujit Manohar Patil vs the Panvel Municipal Corporation

Masira Bi Hanif Patel vs Union of India

Welfare Associations of Legal Cadre Throu. Sec. Virag Vijay Gaikwad vs Union of India Throu. Gen. Manager Cental Railway and Ors.

Shantaram Bhikan Mahajan vs Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation

Haribhau Mahadeo Patil vs the State of Maharashtra General Administration Dept and Anr.