Rajesh Devidas Kardile v. Panvel Municipal Corporation and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Common listing order: matters could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; existing interim orders continue subject to compliance; matters listed on dates in January–February 2025.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by GAURI GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD AMIT Date: GAEKWAD 2024.12.06 12:41:09 +0530
.. 1 .. common order
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION/ ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.
DATE : 3rd DECEMBER, 2024
P.C. :-
- At the time of rising at 5:15 pm, the matters
mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.
- In several of these matters, there are office
objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.
- Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.
Coram
Ravindra V. Ghuge
Ashwin D. Bhobe
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Chandrakant Surendra Singh vs State Bank of India
Kiran Ambadas Aher vs State of Maharashtra
Shakuntala Tulshiram Gangurde and Ors. vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.
M/S. Trimos Metrology (I) Private Limited Thr. Mr. Vivit Vikram Dalal vs Trimos Sa Thr. Poa.Mr. Natarajan Ramaswamy Iyer