Kavita Chintaman Gaikwad v. Union of India and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court; common order dated 21.04.2025; Coram Ravindra V. Ghuge and Ashwin D. Bhobe; per court; paucity of time; matters not taken up at 6.10 p.m.; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders to continue; affidavit in reply/rejoinder to be filed before next date; listing chart 02/05/2025, 11/06/2025, 12/06/2025, 27/06/2025, 30/06/2025; Fresh Admission; For Admission; Urgent Admission; Due Admission; For Final Hearing; civil appellate jurisdiction / ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
What did the court decide?
Administrative listing order: matters not heard due to paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; ad-interim/interim orders, if any granted earlier, to continue subject to such compliance; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed before the next date; matters listed on dates from 02/05/2025 to 30/06/2025 across Fresh Admission, For Admission, Urgent Admission, Due Admission and For Final Hearing categories.