Sumitra Mallikarjun Pujari Nee Sumitra Rajendra Birajdar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretry School Education and Sports and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bombay High Court common order, 17-04-2025, Coram: Ashwin D. Bhobe & Ravindra V. Ghuge (per Court). Purely administrative: hearing deferred for want of time; office objections to be cleared within two weeks; interim/ad-interim orders to continue; reply/rejoinder affidavits to be filed; matters listed 02-05-2025 to 27-06-2025 (urgent/due admission, urgent/final-hearing-at-admission-stage, disposal, fresh admission). No merits adjudicated; no statute or precedent engaged.
What did the court decide?
No substantive decision rendered. At rising at 6.30 p.m. the charted matters could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; existing ad-interim/interim orders, if any, to continue; reply/rejoinder affidavits, if any, to be filed before the next date; matters listed for dates ranging from 2 May 2025 to 27 June 2025 across categories including urgent admission, urgent order, due admission, final hearing at admission stage, disposal and fresh admission.