Disposed¶¶8

Mangesh Bhimrao Maske and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC11 Feb 2025WP/3955/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bombay High Court common order dated 17.01.2025 by Ghuge and Patil, JJ.; multiple criminal appellate matters deferred for paucity of time; office objections to be removed within two weeks; interim/ad-interim orders to continue subject to compliance; replies/rejoinders to be filed before next date; matters relisted 07.02.2025 to 25.02.2025 under Urgent Admission, Due Admission and Urgent Orders categories; purely administrative listing order, no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Continuation of earlier ad-interim/interim orders, if any, subject to removal of office objections within two weeks; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, to be filed before the next date; matters deferred and assigned new listing dates under the categories shown in the chart. ¶¶8

Mangesh Bhimrao Maske and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra and Anr. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶8

Ratio / Principle

In several of the matters on the board there are office objections, and all office objections are directed to be removed within two weeks.

¶¶7

Key takeaways

Subject to compliance with the direction on office objections, ad-interim/interim orders, if any granted earlier, would continue.ratio¶¶8
Affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, is to be filed before the next date.ratio¶¶9
Hearing of the matters in the chart was deferred for want of time at the rising of the court, and subject to the above the matters are directed to be listed on the dates shown in the chart (between 07.02.2025 and 25.02.2025) under Urgent Admission / Due Admission / Urgent Orders categories.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Common administrative order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, dated 17 January 2025, passed by Ravindra V. Ghuge and Rajesh S. Patil, JJ. ('Per Court'). At the time of rising, the matters in the chart in paragraph 5 could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time. All office objections are to be removed within two weeks; subject to such compliance, ad-interim/interim orders, if any granted earlier, will continue; affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, is to be filed before the next date. The matters are directed to be listed as follows: Serial Nos. 12-13, 15-17, 19-26 on 11.02.2025 (Urgent Admission); Serial Nos. 28-32, 34-43 & 45 on 12.02.2025 (Urgent Admission); Serial Nos. 46-52 on 24.02.2025 (Due Admission); Serial Nos. 54-63 & 65 on 25.02.2025 (Due Admission); Serial Nos. 66-82 and 85-86 on 07.02.2025 (Urgent Orders). No substantive legal issue was decided; no parties, advocates, statutes or precedent citations appear.

¶1

.. 1 .. common-02.01.2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &

¶4

RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE :- 17^th JANUARY, 2025

¶5

Per Court :-

¶6

At the time of rising, the matters mentioned in the chart in paragraph No.5 hereunder, could not be taken up for hearing due to paucity of time.

¶7

In several of these matters, there are office objections. As such, all office objections shall be removed within two weeks.

¶8

Subject to compliance of the above, ad-interim/ interim order, if any granted earlier, would continue.

¶9

The affidavit in reply/rejoinder, if any, shall also be filed

¶10

before the next date.

¶11

Subject to the above, list these matters as under:-

¶12

Serial Nos. of matters on the Board	To be listed on	To be listed in the category
12 to 13	11.02.2025	Urgent Admission
15 to 17	11.02.2025	Urgent Admission
19 to 26	11.02.2025	Urgent Admission
28 to 32	12.02.2025	Urgent Admission
34 to 43 & 45	12.02.2025	Urgent Admission
46 to 52	24.02.2025	Due Admission