Disposed¶33

Mili Healthcare through Its Proprietor v. the State of Maharashtra through Ld Minister for Food and Drugs

Bombay HC7 Aug 2025WP/2525/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Compliance-recording order, Bombay HC OOCJ, 08-08-2025, Revati Mohite Dere & Dr. Neela Gokhale JJ.; Writ Petition Nos. 2505, 2511, 2513, 2525, 2526 of 2025; pharma traders (Yogan Life Care, Aditya Pharma, Vijay Life Care, Mili Healthcare, Navdeep Agencies) v. State of Maharashtra; petitions disposed 19-06-2025; Hon'ble Minister FDA decided petitioners' appeals; petitioner counsel to file stay application by 3.00 p.m.; Government Pleader to decide stay application forthwith; no further orders.

What the court decided

AI extract

Mili Healthcare through Its Proprietor vs the State of Maharashtra through Ld Minister for Food and Drugs — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS

¶2

Digitally signed by NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2025.08.08 17:19:08 +0530

¶3

914-918-wpl.14923,17585,17589,17592 &17595.2025.doc

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.2505 OF 2025

¶6

M/s. Yogan Life Care Through its Proprietor – Chitra Mathavamani ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2511 OF 2025 M/s. Aditya Pharma Through its Partner – Arun Bishan Rana ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2513 OF 2025 M/s. Vijay Life Care Through its Proprietor – Vijay Yashwant Dhanawade ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2525 OF 2025 M/s. Mili Healthcare Through its Proprietor – Mahendra Hukumsing Rajpurohit ...Petitioner

¶7

1/3

¶8

N. S. Chitnis

¶9

914-918-wpl.14923,17585,17589,17592 &17595.2025.doc

¶10

Versus

¶11

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

¶12

...Respondents

¶13

WITH

¶14

WRIT PETITION NO.2526 OF 2025

¶15

M/s. Navdeep Agencies Through its Partner – Vineet Amritlal Chheda ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents

¶16

Mr. Rahul M. More a/w Mr. Sumedh Gaikwad for the Petitioners.

¶17

Ms. P. H. Kantharia, G.P. a/w Ms. Fatima Lakadawala, A.G.P., Mr. Amar Mishra, A.G.P., Ms. Nazia Sheikh, A.G.P., and Ms. Gaurangi Patil, A.G.P. for the Respondents-State.

¶18

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

¶19

DATE : 8^th AUGUST 2025

¶20

P.C. :

¶21

Although the aforesaid writ petitions were disposed of

¶22

vide order dated 19th June 2025, the same were kept today, for recording compliance of the said order.

¶23

We are informed that the Hon’ble Minister, Food and

¶24

Drugs Administration Department, has decided the appeal/s filed by

¶25

2/3

¶26

N. S. Chitnis

¶27

914-918-wpl.14923,17585,17589,17592 &17595.2025.doc

¶28

the aforesaid petitioners.

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioners in all the aforesaid

¶30

petitions states that since the date on which the order will come in force is not mentioned in the order, he will file an appropriate application today by 3.00 p.m. seeking stay of the said order.

¶31

Ms. Kantharia, learned Government Pleader states that if

¶32

an application seeking stay as stated aforesaid is filed, the same will be decided forthwith. Statement accepted.

¶33

In view of the aforesaid statement made by Ms. Kantharia, learned Government Pleader, no further orders.

¶34

. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this

¶35

order.

¶36

DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

¶37

3/3

¶38

N. S. Chitnis

Mili Healthcare through Its Proprietor v. the State of Maharashtra through Ld Minister for Food and Drugs

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Mili Healthcare through Its Proprietor v. the State of Maharashtra through Ld Minister for Food and Drugs

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Mohiuddin Ahmed Vaid vs State of Maharashtra through Its Principal Secretary Minority Development Department

Asian Paints Limited, through Its Authorised Signatory vs Competition Commission of India

Shivram Ganpat Pukle. vs the State of Maharashtra through the Principle Secretary.

Priti Mukesh Goyal vs Union of India through Ministry of External Affairs

Navdeep Agencies vs the State of Maharashtra through Ld. Minister for Food and Drugs Administration Dept.

Yogan Life Care vs the State of Maharashtra through Ld. Minister for Food and Drugs Administration Dept.