Disposed¶5

Yogan Life Care v. the State of Maharashtra through Ld. Minister for Food and Drugs Administration Dept.

Bombay HC31 Jul 2025WP/2505/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Compliance order; writ petitions 2505, 2511, 2513, 2525 & 2526 of 2025; Yogan Life Care; Aditya Pharma; Vijay Life Care; Mili Healthcare; Navdeep Agencies; State of Maharashtra; Food and Drugs Administration; Hon'ble Minister decided appeals; stay application; order silent on date of coming into force; Government Pleader P. H. Kantharia; Rahul M. More; Revati Mohite Dere; Neela Gokhale; 8 August 2025; no further orders; authenticated copy.

What did the court decide?

No further orders passed; the Government Pleader's statement that any stay application against the Minister's (FDA) order would be decided forthwith was accepted, and all concerned were directed to act on the authenticated copy of the order. ¶5

Yogan Life Care vs the State of Maharashtra through Ld. Minister for Food and Drugs Administration Dept. — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶5

Issue for consideration

Whether the writ petitions, already disposed of on 19th June 2025 and relisted for recording compliance, could be closed, given that the Hon'ble Minister (FDA) had decided the petitioners' appeals and the petitioners intended to seek stay of the Minister's order on the ground that it does not mention the date on which it comes into force.

¶3

Court's answer

The court accepted the Government Pleader's statement that if an application seeking stay of the Minister's order is filed, the same will be decided forthwith.

¶4

Ratio / Principle

In view of the Government Pleader's statement, the court passed no further orders.

¶5

Key takeaways

All concerned were directed to act on the authenticated copy of the order.obiter¶5

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bombay High Court (Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction), Coram Revati Mohite Dere & Dr. Neela Gokhale, JJ., Order dated 8th August 2025 in Writ Petition No.2505 of 2025 (with Writ Petition Nos. 2511, 2513, 2525 & 2526 of 2025) - M/s. Yogan Life Care, M/s. Aditya Pharma, M/s. Vijay Life Care, M/s. Mili Healthcare and M/s. Navdeep Agencies v. The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Compliance-recording order: the petitions, already disposed of by order dated 19th June 2025, were relisted to record compliance. The court was informed that the Hon'ble Minister, Food and Drugs Administration Department, had decided the petitioners' appeals. Petitioners' counsel stated that since the Minister's order did not mention the date on which it comes into force, he would file a stay application the same day by 3.00 p.m.; the Government Pleader (Ms. P. H. Kantharia) stated such an application would be decided forthwith. The court accepted the statement and passed no further orders, directing all concerned to act on the authenticated copy.

¶1

NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS

¶2

Digitally signed by NISHA SANDEEP CHITNIS Date: 2025.08.08 17:19:08 +0530

¶3

914-918-wpl.14923,17585,17589,17592 &17595.2025.doc

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.2505 OF 2025

¶6

M/s. Yogan Life Care Through its Proprietor – Chitra Mathavamani ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2511 OF 2025 M/s. Aditya Pharma Through its Partner – Arun Bishan Rana ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2513 OF 2025 M/s. Vijay Life Care Through its Proprietor – Vijay Yashwant Dhanawade ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2525 OF 2025 M/s. Mili Healthcare Through its Proprietor – Mahendra Hukumsing Rajpurohit ...Petitioner

¶7

1/3

¶8

N. S. Chitnis

¶9

914-918-wpl.14923,17585,17589,17592 &17595.2025.doc

¶10

Versus

¶11

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

¶12

...Respondents

¶13

WITH

¶14

WRIT PETITION NO.2526 OF 2025

¶15

M/s. Navdeep Agencies Through its Partner – Vineet Amritlal Chheda ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents

¶16

Mr. Rahul M. More a/w Mr. Sumedh Gaikwad for the Petitioners.

¶17

Ms. P. H. Kantharia, G.P. a/w Ms. Fatima Lakadawala, A.G.P., Mr. Amar Mishra, A.G.P., Ms. Nazia Sheikh, A.G.P., and Ms. Gaurangi Patil, A.G.P. for the Respondents-State.

¶18

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

¶19

DATE : 8^th AUGUST 2025

¶20

P.C. :

¶21

Although the aforesaid writ petitions were disposed of

¶22

vide order dated 19th June 2025, the same were kept today, for recording compliance of the said order.

¶23

We are informed that the Hon’ble Minister, Food and

¶24

Drugs Administration Department, has decided the appeal/s filed by

¶25

2/3

¶26

N. S. Chitnis

¶27

914-918-wpl.14923,17585,17589,17592 &17595.2025.doc

¶28

the aforesaid petitioners.

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioners in all the aforesaid

¶30

petitions states that since the date on which the order will come in force is not mentioned in the order, he will file an appropriate application today by 3.00 p.m. seeking stay of the said order.

¶31

Ms. Kantharia, learned Government Pleader states that if

¶32

an application seeking stay as stated aforesaid is filed, the same will be decided forthwith. Statement accepted.

¶33

In view of the aforesaid statement made by Ms. Kantharia, learned Government Pleader, no further orders.

¶34

. All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this

¶35

order.

¶36

DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

¶37

3/3

¶38

N. S. Chitnis

Yogan Life Care v. the State of Maharashtra through Ld. Minister for Food and Drugs Administration Dept.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogan Life Care v. the State of Maharashtra through Ld. Minister for Food and Drugs Administration Dept.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Janabai Savleram Raut vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Maruti Appa Pandhare vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Secretary of Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

Premium Elegance Properties LLP vs Kshatriya Maratha Dhangar Samaj Trust and Anr.

Yachneet Pushkarna vs Union of India through Ministry of Home Affairs

Aditya Pharma through Its Partner Arun Bishan Rana vs the State of Maharashtra through Ld Minister for Food and Drugs

Vijay Life Care through Its Proprietor Mr. Vijay Yashwant Dhanawade vs the State of Maharashtra through Ld Minister for Food and Durgs Administration Department