Shekhar Indu Salian vs State of Maharashtra through Govt. Pleader High Court Bombay

¶1

301 TO 307-WP-2028-24 & ORS..DOC

¶2

JYOTI RAJESH MANE

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

Digitally signed by JYOTI RAJESH MANE Date: 2025.12.01 10:58:29 +0530

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 2028 OF 2024
Shekhar Indu Salian ...Petitioner Versus
State Of Maharashtra
Through Govt. Pleader High
Court Bombay ...Respondents
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 2033 OF 2024
Laxman Shekhar Salian ...Petitioner Versus
State Of Maharashtra
Through Govt. Pleader High
Court Bombay ...Respondents
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 2220 OF 2024
Shekhar Indu Salian ...Petitioner Versus
State Of Maharashtra
Through Govt. Pleader High
Court Bombay ...Respondents
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 2248 OF 2024
Shekhar Indu Salian ...Petitioner Versus
State Of Maharashtra
Through Govt. Pleader High
Court Bombay ...Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 2253 OF 2024
Om Shri Jagdishwari Seva Samiti ...Petitioner Versus
State Of Maharashtra
Through Govt. Pleader High
Court Bombay ...Respondents

¶6

Page 1 of 3

¶7

Mane

¶8

301 TO 307-WP-2028-24 & ORS..DOC

¶9

AND

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO. 2301 OF 2024

¶11

Sunita Laxman Salian ...Petitioner Versus State Of Maharashtra Through Govt. Pleader High Court Bombay ...Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO. 2436 OF 2024 Shekhar Indu Salian ...Petitioner Versus State Of Maharashtra Through Govt. Pleader High Court Bombay ...Respondents

¶12

Mr. Sagar Batavia i/b. Mr. A.N. Giri, for Petitioner. Ms. Usha Rahi, AGP for Respondent No.1/State. Mr. Akhilesh Adhav, for Respondent No.3. Mr. Kanhaiya S. Yadav a/w. Mr. Paras Jadhav, for Respondent No.4.

¶13

CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ.

¶14

DATE: 24^th NOVEMBER 2025

¶15

P.C.

¶16

This batch of Petitions in which the prayers are similar, are being disposed of by this common order. The prayers as made in the lead Petition is required to be noted, which reads thus:

¶17

a) That a writ of certiorari, writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction be issued calling for the records and after examining the legality and proprieties of the application, be ordered and directed respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner’s application dated 18^th April 2023, within time bound schedule.

¶18

We may also record that the grievance of some of Petitioners apart from

¶19

eligibility is also in regard to their application being not decided, in regard to their grievances in relation to the scheme in question.

¶20

Page 2 of 3

¶21

Mane

¶22

301 TO 307-WP-2028-24 & ORS..DOC

¶23

At the outset learned counsel for the Respondent No.4 has stated that insofar as Petitioners in Writ Petition No.2253/2024 is concerned their eligibility is already decided on 7^th July 2023, and hence such Petition is not required to be adjudicated. The copy deciding the eligibility in favour of the Petitioner is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Thus, the Writ Petition No.2253/2024, is disposed of as infructuous .

¶24

Insofar as other Petitions are concerned, it appears that proceedings in regard to the determination are pending consideration of the Competent Authority. Let the Competent Authority hear all the parties including the developer, as also the Society and decide the Petitioners application for eligibility and/or certain other issues with regard to the scheme, as expeditiously as possible and in any event within a period of 4 weeks from the date a copy of this order is placed before the Competent Authority. Accordingly Writ Petition No.2028/2024, Writ Petition No.2033/2024, Writ Petition No.2220/2024, Writ Petition No.2248/2024, Writ Petition No. 2301/2024 and Writ Petition No.2436/2024, are disposed of in these terms.

¶25

All contentions of the parties are expressly kept open.

¶26

No costs.

¶27

(AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)

¶28

Page 3 of 3

¶29

Mane

Shekhar Indu Salian v. State of Maharashtra through Govt. Pleader High Court Bombay

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shekhar Indu Salian v. State of Maharashtra through Govt. Pleader High Court Bombay

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Zahir Shah M. Ansari vs State of Maharashtra through Office of the Government Pleader

Chindhu Tukaram Nee Tularam Shilvane and Ors. vs State of Maharashtra Thr Revenue and Forest Dept and Ors.

Mohameed Isa Pocha vs State of Maharashtra Thr Revenue and Forest Dept and Ors.

Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Co-Operative Housing Society and Ors. Vs State of Maharahstr and Ors.

Mota Mandir Trust and 5 Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and 3 Ors.

One Stop Business LLP vs Deputy Collector, (Special Cell,) Sra