Dismissed¶33
Chetankumar Dhansukhbhai Patel v. the Administrator Union Territory and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/13818/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bombay High Court (Manish Pitale, J., 27 November 2025): batch of writ petitions led by W.P. No.13749 of 2025 (Dipakkumar Patel v. Administrator, Union Territory and another) dismissing all petitions for want of prosecution due to persistent non-appearance of petitioners; underlying challenge to Labour Court awards answering references in the negative; petitions earlier listed under caption 'for dismissal'; no counsel present ('None for Petitioners').
What did the court decide?
All the writ petitions in the batch are dismissed for want of prosecution, there being no appearance on behalf of the petitioners when the petitions were called out for hearing. ¶33