Dismissed¶33
Sandeepkumar Dabyabhai Patel v. the Admnistrator Union Territory and Anr.
Bombay HCWP/14903/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Dismissal for want of prosecution; non-appearance of petitioners; batch of writ petitions of 2025 (Nos. 13749 to 14903) versus Administrator, Union Territory and another; challenge to Labour Court awards whereby references answered in negative; Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction; Manish Pitale, J.; petitions listed under caption 'for dismissal'; no appearance despite repeated call-outs; no relief granted; no quantum involved; limited precedential value.
What did the court decide?
Despite the petitions being called out for hearing on multiple dates, including twice on some dates, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioners. ¶32