Dinya Dinesh Wagh v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Paucity-of-time adjournment order; Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench; bench of Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi and Hiten S. Venegavkar, JJ.; order dated 09.12.2025; batch/board listing of around sixty matters including writ petitions of 2023-2025 (Nos. 454/2024 to 13365/2025), Public Interest Litigation Nos. 147/2014, 26/2024, 72/2024, Criminal PIL No. 7/2024, Suo Motu (PIL) No. 1 of 201 (truncated in source), Criminal Application No. 1669/2025 and various Civil Applications; matters adjourned to 12.03.2026, 13.03.2026 and 16.03.2026; interim relief, undertakings and statements directed to continue till next date. Contains no merits adjudication, no issues, no holdings, no statutory reference and no precedent citation; citable only to show pendency of the listed matters and survival of interim orders as on 09.12.2025.
What did the court decide?
Purely administrative adjournment: the matters listed on the board were adjourned to the dates mentioned against them (the Next Date column shows 12.03.2026, 13.03.2026 and 16.03.2026), and it was directed that any interim relief, undertaking or statement in these matters shall continue till the next date.