Disposed¶16
Padmakar Dnyanoba Kasbe v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Bombay HCCP/96/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Aurangabad Bench, 2025: Contempt Petition No. 96 of 2015 arising from W.P. 6934/2012; petitioner Padmakar Dnyanoba Kasbe; respondents the State of Maharashtra and others. Respondent no.3's advocate (V.V. Bhavthankar h/f Tandale P.R.) stated on instructions that the petitioner's representation was decided and the order complied with; the Court accepted the statement and disposed of the contempt petition. Keywords: contempt petition, compliance, representation decided, disposal, State of Maharashtra.
What did the court decide?
Accepting the on-instructions statement of the learned Advocate for respondent no.3 that the petitioner's representation had been decided and the order thereby complied with, the Court disposed of the contempt petition. ¶16