Dr. Bhalchandra S/O Jageshwar Subhedar v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC3 Mar 2025SMPIL/4/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suo Motu PIL No. 4 of 2024, Nagpur Bench, disposed 15/07/2025 (2025:BHC-NAG:6819-DB); NIT bid/offers finalized for land made available for Multi Speciality and Super Speciality Hospital; State Government approval vide Government Resolution dated 14/07/2025; affidavit by respondent No.5 - NIT in compliance with order dated 28/04/2025; execution of documents in favour of successful bidders in accordance with law; pending applications disposed; intervener in CAO No.1735/2019; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of without costs; respondent - NIT and the State Government to proceed for execution of documents in favour of the successful bidders in accordance with law; all pending applications disposed of. ¶¶15

Dr. Bhalchandra S/O Jageshwar Subhedar vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Mumbai and Others — Bombay HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶15

Issue for consideration

Whether the cause espoused in the PIL - concerning the land made available for a Multi Speciality and Super Speciality Hospital and the finalization of the Trust's bid/offers - stood redressed.

¶¶14

Court's answer

With respondent NIT having finalized the bid/offers and the State Government having granted approval vide Government Resolution dated 14/07/2025, the cause sought to be espoused in the present PIL stood redressed.

¶¶14

Ratio / Principle

In view of the aforesaid terms, the petition stands disposed of, with no costs.

¶¶15

Key takeaways

The respondent - NIT and the State Government shall proceed for execution of the documents in favour of the successful bidders in accordance with the law.ratio¶¶16
In view of the disposal of the present petition, all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.ratio¶¶17

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench - Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation No. 4 of 2024 (neutral citation 2025:BHC-NAG:6819-DB), Dr. Bhalchandra s/o Jageshwar Subhedar v. State of Maharashtra and others; coram Nitin W. Sambre and Sachin S. Deshmukh, JJ.; decided 15/07/2025. The land in question had been made available to the public at large for a Multi Speciality and Super Speciality Hospital; offers were submitted by the Trust, respondent No.5 - NIT finalized the bid/offers, and the State Government granted approval vide Government Resolution dated 14/07/2025. Holding that the cause espoused in the PIL thereby stood redressed, the Court disposed of the petition without costs, clarified that NIT and the State Government shall proceed for execution of documents in favour of the successful bidders in accordance with law, and disposed of all pending applications.

¶1

2025:BHC-NAG:6819-DB

¶2

1 906-SMPIL-4-2024.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

SUO MOTU PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 4 OF 2024

¶5

DR. BHALCHANDRA S/O JAGESHWAR SUBHEDAR

¶6

Vrs.

¶7

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order

¶9

Shri Akshay Sudame, Advocate for petitioner. Shri Nikhil Kirtane, Advocate for respondent No.2. Shri Girish A. Kunte, Advocate for respondent No.5. Ms. S. S. Jachak, Advocate for respondent No.6. Shri D. P. Thakare, Addl. G. P. for respondent Nos.1, 3 & to 4. Shri Shrikanth Reddy, Advocate h/f Shri S. P. Bhandarkar, Advocate for Intervener in CAO No.1735/2019.

¶10

CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE AND SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 15/07/2025.

¶11

In compliance with the order dated 28/04/2025, the respondent No.5 – NIT has placed affidavit on record.

¶12

The land in question appears to have been made available to the public at large for the purpose of Multi Speciality and Super Speciality Hospital and accordingly, offers were submitted by the Trust. It appears that the respondent – NIT has finalized the bid / offers and approval is already granted by the State Government vide its Government Resolution dated 14/07/2025.

¶13

2 906-SMPIL-4-2024.odt

¶14

In the wake of above, the cause which is sought to be espoused in the present PIL stood redressed.

¶15

In view of the aforesaid terms, the petition accordingly stands disposed of. No costs.

¶16

Needless to clarify that the respondent – NIT and the State Government shall proceed for execution of the documents in favour of the successful bidders in accordance with the law.

¶17

In view of the disposal of the present petition, all pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

¶18

[SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.] [NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]

¶19

Choulwar

¶20

Signed by: V.M. Choulwar (VMC) Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 17/07/2025 13:05:31

All orders in this case

36 orders share this CNR

31 Jul 2019Order 1 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
28 Aug 2019Order 2 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
18 Sept 2019Order 3 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
6 Nov 2019Order 4 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
3 Dec 2019Order 5 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
3 Dec 2019Order 6 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
17 Dec 2019Order 7 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
8 Jan 2020Order 8 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
22 Jan 2020Order 9 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
12 Feb 2020Order 10 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
18 Jan 2023Order 11 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
25 Jan 2023Order 12 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
29 Mar 2023Order 13 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
5 Jul 2023Order 14 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
12 Jul 2023Order 15 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
23 Aug 2023Order 16 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
13 Sept 2023Order 17 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
27 Sept 2023Order 18 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
11 Oct 2023Order 19 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
1 Nov 2023Order 20 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
29 Nov 2023Order 21 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
11 Dec 2023Order 22 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
24 Jan 2024Order 23 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
21 Feb 2024Order 24 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
13 Mar 2024Order 25 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
24 Apr 2024Order 26 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
19 Jun 2024Order 27 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
14 Aug 2024Order 28 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
4 Sept 2024Order 29 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
25 Sept 2024Order 30 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
11 Dec 2024Order 31 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
10 Feb 2025Order 32 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
3 Mar 2025Order 33 — this page · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
17 Mar 2025Order 34 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
28 Apr 2025Order 35 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh
15 Jul 2025Order 36 · Nitin W. Sambre Sachin S. Deshmukh

Dr. Bhalchandra S/O Jageshwar Subhedar v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Bhalchandra S/O Jageshwar Subhedar v. State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Nitin S/O. Shrikishanrao Lokhande vs State of Maha., Thr. Secy., Dept. of Agriculture, Mumbai and Ors.

Nitin S/O. Shrikishanrao Lokhande vs State of Maha., Thr. Secy., Dept. of Agriculture, Mumbai and Ors.

Ajay Devidas Hirulkar and Another vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept., Mumbai and Ors.

Ganesh Shamraoji Bharadbhunje vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Scheduled Tribe Caste Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur and Others

Dr. Bhalchandra S/O Jageshwar Subhedar vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Ministry of Urban Development, Mumbai and Others

Ganesh S/O Madan Rathod and Another vs the State of Maha, Thr. Election Commission of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Mumbai and Ors.