Padmasinh Bajirao Patil v. Central Bureau Investigation and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Administrative/procedural order of the Bombay High Court (Milind N. Jadhav, J., 15.01.2025) in Criminal Revision Application No. 420 of 2024 (Padmasinh Bajirao Patil v. CBI & Anr.). Jointly addressed praecipe dated 10.01.2025 to Registrar (Judicial-I) for treating matter as 'Part-Heard' declined for want of consent — CBI Advocate confirmed no consent; complainant's Advocate absent/unable to join via video conference and gave no consent. Registry directed to place matter before appropriate/regular Court. Keywords: part-heard consent, praecipe, Registrar (Judicial-I), CBI, criminal revision, Bombay High Court, listing/reassignment of matter. No statutes or cases cited; no quantum involved.
What did the court decide?
No substantive relief granted; procedural direction issued to the Registry to take appropriate steps for placing the matter before the appropriate / regular Court instead of treating it as 'Part-Heard'.